The final presentations of our class have broadened from the single topic of lifeboat ethics. Deep versus shallow ecology, Paul Taylor, Biocentrism, and the meat or mercy debate were just a few of the diverse topics chosen.
Even though Michelle discussed lifeboat ethics, she went in-depth on its history, including in it the discussion of the 3 main choices that we can make and Midgley’s opinion. Bethany and Emily contrasted deep versus shallow ecology, highlighting Arne Naess’ view. They both discussed the need for change and how the decisions that we make affect all of nature. They also emphasized the need for greater respect towards all living things. Alice went on to deliberate on Paul Taylor and biocentrism. She discussed his 3 main theories and included Kant’s view in her paper as well. Ashley discussed the differing views of on animals, specifically the meat or mercy debate. She included the similarities of slavery and the issue of factory farming in her paper. She also discussed the differences and benefits of family versus factory farming.
One of the presentations that I felt very strongly about was Joel’s life boat/overpopulation topic. As a solution to the problem of overpopulation, he says that we need to limit the amount of children people have and refrain from treating people with medications that will only prolong their life. I think his topic brought up some very interesting points. I also think that he chose a paper topic that is very controversial and deserves a lot of thought and an analysis of our own individual beliefs.
Overall, I have found these presentations to be interesting and informative. I have found that hearing the information again has helped me to retain much of what we have learned this semester.
No comments:
Post a Comment