Another part of this section is when Kohak addresses many different biologists, ecologists, theorists, etc. and their views of how this world is reacting to problems. Konrad Lorenz for example is a biologist that says "human beings are capable of killing a brother -- in the conviction that they are doing good." This could be seen as one excuse for why people can kill these animals, because they think it will help in the long run. In reality, this could make sense to an extent, that if there are animals that are overpopulating the area, in order to keep them under control, to kill them would be the best thing. But just think... aren't humans almost overpopulating earth? What about the baby boom generation? If we keep reproducing, that is just as bad as all the deer reproducing. This is where some people say yeah but they are only deer -- but who says they are an only. They were put here for a reason and if they are being killed, then they are not fulfilling their reason for being here.
An analogy that stuck out most to me was the ape/wolf comparison to humans. At first we were like the apes, eating when we wanted and not being very social, but then as time went on, we became like the wolves, a pack animal. Families would sit down to dinner every night and everything was done together. This was true up until about the 70's-80's and then people got "busy." We are still slipping back into the ape-like creatures, because of things such as sports, school, travel, etc. All of these are reasons, or excuses, for not being able to sit down with the rest of our family for dinner, just like the apes.
No comments:
Post a Comment